A request to postpone authorized proceedings associated to marital dissolution in Arizona, particularly to safe authorized illustration, is usually a important procedural step. This motion pauses the continuing trial, offering a person the required time to seek out and retain an lawyer. This delay prevents the person from continuing with out skilled steering, probably impacting the equity and consequence of the case.
Securing counsel is prime to navigating complicated authorized issues. An lawyer supplies experience in Arizona household legislation, guaranteeing correct presentation of proof, adherence to courtroom procedures, and safety of the consumer’s rights. This safeguard is especially important when important property, little one custody, or spousal upkeep are at stake. Traditionally, authorized illustration has been acknowledged as important for equitable decision in divorce instances.
The ramifications of continuing with out correct authorized recommendation are appreciable, underscoring the importance of requesting a delay for this objective. Understanding the situations below which such requests are usually granted, potential challenges to the movement, and the steps concerned to find appropriate authorized illustration are key concerns when going through divorce proceedings in Arizona.
1. Movement for Continuance
A Movement for Continuance is a proper request to the courtroom to postpone a scheduled listening to or trial date. Within the context of divorce proceedings in Arizona, it represents a procedural mechanism used to request a delay, generally when a celebration seeks to safe authorized illustration. This motion instantly pertains to the flexibility to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer,” offering the required time to acquire counsel.
-
Authorized Foundation
The authorized foundation for granting a Movement for Continuance rests on the courtroom’s discretion, weighing elements comparable to equity to each events, the necessity for satisfactory preparation, and the environment friendly administration of justice. Arizona Guidelines of Civil Process define the method for submitting such motions. Granting a continuance permits a celebration to adjust to authorized necessities, comparable to correct discover or discovery, earlier than continuing with the trial. That is important when a person initially proceeded professional se (with out an lawyer) and later acknowledges the necessity for authorized experience.
-
Causes for Submitting
A number of causes might justify submitting a Movement for Continuance to retain authorized illustration. These embody unexpected circumstances stopping the person from securing counsel earlier, complexity of the case necessitating authorized experience, or incapability to afford authorized illustration with out further time to safe funding. For instance, a person might have initially believed the divorce was uncontested, however later found hidden property or contested little one custody points, requiring speedy authorized intervention.
-
Components of a Movement
A Movement for Continuance should adhere to particular necessities. This contains submitting a written movement with the courtroom, stating the explanations for the requested delay, offering supporting documentation (if obtainable), and demonstrating due diligence in making an attempt to safe counsel. The movement also needs to deal with potential prejudice to the opposing occasion if the continuance is granted and suggest an affordable timeframe for rescheduling the trial. Failure to incorporate these components might consequence within the movement’s denial.
-
Courtroom’s Determination-Making
The courtroom’s choice on a Movement for Continuance is discretionary. When contemplating the movement, the courtroom will weigh the shifting occasion’s causes for the delay towards the potential prejudice to the opposing occasion. If the delay would unduly prejudice the opposite occasion, comparable to witnesses turning into unavailable or proof turning into stale, the courtroom might deny the movement. Conversely, if denying the movement would severely drawback the shifting occasion, the courtroom might grant the continuance to make sure a good and simply consequence.
In abstract, a Movement for Continuance is a crucial procedural software in Arizona divorce instances, notably when a celebration requires further time to safe authorized illustration. The courtroom’s analysis of such motions balances the rights of each events with the overarching objective of reaching an equitable decision, emphasizing the significance of a well-supported and correctly introduced request.
2. Justification for Request
The success of a movement to proceed a divorce trial in Arizona to retain authorized counsel is intrinsically linked to the justification offered. The courtroom’s choice hinges on the power and validity of the explanations introduced for needing further time to safe an lawyer. This justification serves as the inspiration upon which the request is evaluated, figuring out whether or not the person’s want for illustration outweighs the potential inconvenience or prejudice to the opposing occasion.
A standard justification entails demonstrating a major change in circumstances that necessitates authorized illustration. As an illustration, if one occasion initially believed the divorce could be uncontested however later found complicated monetary property or contentious custody disputes, the necessity for authorized experience turns into obvious. Equally, an unexpected medical emergency or job loss that impacts the flexibility to afford authorized counsel initially can warrant a continuance. Strong documentation, comparable to medical information or termination notices, strengthens the justification and will increase the probability of the courtroom granting the movement. And not using a compelling rationale, the courtroom is much less more likely to interrupt the proceedings and probably drawback the opposite occasion, who could also be ready to proceed.
In conclusion, the justification supporting a request to postpone a divorce trial in Arizona for the aim of securing authorized illustration is just not merely a procedural formality; it’s the core aspect that dictates the courtroom’s choice. A well-articulated, factually supported justification, highlighting the need of authorized counsel in mild of particular circumstances, considerably enhances the probabilities of acquiring a continuance and guaranteeing a good and equitable decision to the divorce proceedings. Recognizing the causal relationship between a robust justification and the courtroom’s willingness to grant the movement is important for people in search of authorized illustration throughout divorce proceedings.
3. Courtroom’s Discretion
The choice to grant a continuance in an Arizona divorce trial, permitting a celebration time to safe authorized illustration, rests essentially inside the courtroom’s discretion. This discretion is just not absolute however is guided by authorized rules and concerns of equity to each events concerned. The courtroom should steadiness the requesting occasion’s want for authorized counsel towards the potential prejudice and inconvenience imposed on the opposing occasion by delaying the proceedings. This analysis requires a cautious evaluation of the precise circumstances introduced in every case. As an illustration, if a celebration unexpectedly faces complicated authorized points that require skilled help, the courtroom would possibly lean in the direction of granting a continuance. Conversely, if the delay would considerably hurt the opposite occasion’s capacity to current their case as a result of witness unavailability or misplaced proof, the courtroom would possibly deny the request. The courtroom’s evaluation is, subsequently, central to the method of “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer,” performing because the filter by way of which such requests are evaluated.
The sensible software of the courtroom’s discretion is clear within the numerous outcomes noticed in comparable instances. In a single situation, a celebration who diligently sought authorized counsel however confronted unexpected delays as a result of an lawyer’s sickness is likely to be granted a continuance. The courtroom, on this scenario, would possibly take into account the occasion’s proactive efforts as mitigating elements. In one other case, if a celebration intentionally delayed in search of authorized illustration till the eve of trial, the courtroom would possibly deny the request, deeming it a strategic maneuver to hinder the proceedings. These examples illustrate that the courtroom’s train of discretion is very fact-specific, requiring a radical examination of the requesting occasion’s conduct, the explanations for the delay, and the potential penalties for the opposing occasion. Furthermore, the courtroom is more likely to take into account the affect of the continuance by itself docket and the general administration of justice.
In abstract, the courtroom’s discretionary authority is an important part of the method of “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer” in Arizona divorce instances. This discretion mandates a cautious balancing of competing pursuits and a radical evaluation of the distinctive circumstances introduced in every case. Understanding how courts train this discretion is important for people in search of to postpone a divorce trial to safe authorized illustration. Whereas no consequence will be assured, a well-reasoned and documented request, demonstrating a real want for authorized counsel and minimizing potential prejudice to the opposing occasion, will increase the probability of a positive ruling. The inherent problem lies in predicting how a courtroom will weigh these varied elements, highlighting the significance of in search of authorized recommendation to navigate this complicated procedural facet of divorce proceedings.
4. Affect on Case Timeline
The act of in search of to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer” invariably introduces an affect on the established case timeline. This affect is just not merely a postponement of the trial date however a ripple impact influencing varied levels of the authorized course of. Securing a continuance causes delays in discovery, settlement negotiations, and probably non permanent orders relating to little one custody or assist. The longer the delay, the extra complicated the case might turn into, as proof can turn into stale, witnesses would possibly turn into unavailable, and the emotional toll on all events concerned will increase. The preliminary request, if granted, units in movement a series of occasions that should be rigorously managed to reduce disruptions to the general decision of the divorce.
The sensible significance of understanding this affect is paramount for each events concerned. For the occasion requesting the continuance, acknowledging the potential delays permits for strategic planning. This contains proactively managing expectations, guaranteeing steady communication with the courtroom and opposing counsel, and mitigating any potential prejudice arising from the delayed proceedings. For the opposing occasion, consciousness of the timeline affect permits for knowledgeable decision-making relating to whether or not to oppose the continuance or search various options to expedite the method. For instance, the opposing occasion would possibly comply with a restricted continuance or suggest various dispute decision strategies to reduce total delays. Neglecting to contemplate the affect on the case timeline can result in extended authorized battles, elevated prices, and heightened emotional misery for all concerned.
In conclusion, the request to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer” triggers a major alteration within the case timeline, requiring proactive administration and strategic decision-making from each events. Whereas securing authorized illustration is a basic proper, understanding the ensuing delays and their potential penalties is important for navigating the divorce course of successfully. Recognizing this affect permits for a extra knowledgeable strategy, minimizing disruptions and selling a extra environment friendly decision. The problem lies in balancing the necessity for authorized illustration with the crucial of resolving the divorce in a well timed and equitable method, thus safeguarding the pursuits of all events concerned.
5. Availability of Attorneys
The supply of attorneys instantly influences the feasibility of acquiring a continuance in an Arizona divorce trial to safe authorized illustration. The convenience or issue to find appropriate counsel considerably impacts the courtroom’s choice on whether or not to grant the request to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer.” Restricted lawyer availability can strengthen the justification for a continuance, whereas ample availability might weaken it.
-
Geographic Location
Lawyer availability varies considerably throughout completely different geographic areas inside Arizona. Rural areas or smaller cities might have fewer attorneys specializing in household legislation in comparison with metropolitan facilities like Phoenix or Tucson. In areas with restricted authorized professionals, people in search of illustration would possibly face prolonged search instances and potential delays in securing counsel. This shortage instantly helps the need of a continuance, because the courtroom might acknowledge the challenges to find appropriate illustration inside a compressed timeframe. Demonstrating restricted native choices strengthens the argument for granting the requested delay.
-
Specialised Experience
Divorce instances involving complicated monetary property, enterprise valuations, or intricate little one custody preparations typically require attorneys with specialised experience. The supply of such specialists will be restricted, additional complicating the method of securing authorized illustration. If a person can show that their case necessitates a particular authorized skillset that’s not available, the courtroom could also be extra inclined to grant a continuance. As an illustration, a case involving worldwide little one abduction requires an lawyer with particular information of worldwide legislation, and the restricted variety of such consultants might justify a delay in proceedings.
-
Monetary Constraints
Even when attorneys are geographically obtainable and possess the required experience, their affordability stays a major issue. Many people going through divorce proceedings have restricted monetary sources, limiting their capacity to retain skilled counsel. The supply of attorneys prepared to supply professional bono companies or settle for fee plans is usually restricted, particularly for complicated or prolonged instances. Documenting makes an attempt to safe reasonably priced illustration and demonstrating monetary constraints bolsters the justification for requesting a continuance, highlighting the limitations to acquiring authorized help with out further time.
-
Lawyer Workload and Caseload
Attorneys, even these with ample experience and affordable charges, might have restricted availability as a result of present workload and caseload. A busy lawyer might not have the ability to instantly settle for a brand new case, notably if it entails an impending trial date. Demonstrating that a number of attorneys have declined illustration as a result of scheduling conflicts or prior commitments reinforces the need of a continuance. The courtroom is extra more likely to grant a delay when it’s evident that the person has actively sought authorized help however has been hindered by circumstances past their management.
Finally, the supply of attorneys performs an important position within the courtroom’s evaluation of a request to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer.” The convenience or issue in securing appropriate illustration instantly influences the justification for the continuance and the courtroom’s willingness to grant the delay. Demonstrating real efforts to seek out obtainable and reasonably priced counsel, whereas highlighting geographic limitations, specialised experience necessities, and lawyer workload, strengthens the argument for a continuance and will increase the probability of a positive consequence.
6. Complexity of Case
The diploma of complexity inherent in a divorce case considerably influences the need for, and the probability of acquiring, a continuance to safe authorized illustration. The extra intricate the authorized and factual points concerned, the larger the demand for skilled experience to navigate the proceedings successfully. Complexity features as a major driver in justifying a request to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer.” Instances involving substantial property, intricate enterprise valuations, disputes over little one custody with psychological evaluations, or allegations of home violence current multifaceted challenges. With out authorized experience, a litigant faces a substantial drawback, probably resulting in an unfavorable consequence. Such complicated conditions underscore the important position of authorized counsel and the rationale for suspending a trial to permit satisfactory illustration to be secured.
Actual-world examples vividly illustrate this connection. Think about a divorce involving a closely-held enterprise the place the valuation is contested. The method of figuring out the enterprise’s true price requires experience in monetary accounting and forensic evaluation, expertise past the grasp of most laypersons. Equally, in custody battles the place psychological evaluations are launched to evaluate parental health, understanding the nuances of psychological testing and presenting counter-evidence calls for authorized coaching. Moreover, instances involving cross-state or worldwide jurisdictional points add layers of procedural and authorized complexity. In every of those situations, the potential for missteps and antagonistic penalties with out authorized counsel is substantial. Consequently, the courtroom is extra more likely to grant a continuance to make sure equity and defend the litigant’s rights, recognizing that continuing with out illustration would compromise the integrity of the adversarial course of.
In abstract, the complexity of a divorce case is a decisive issue within the pursuit of a continuance to safe authorized illustration. It instantly impacts the flexibility of a celebration to adequately current their case, navigate complicated authorized procedures, and defend their pursuits. A transparent demonstration of the case’s complexity, together with proof of makes an attempt to safe counsel, strengthens the argument for a continuance. Understanding this relationship is essential for people going through intricate divorce proceedings, because it highlights the significance of prioritizing authorized illustration and using procedural mechanisms to make sure a good and equitable consequence. The problem lies in successfully speaking the precise complexities to the courtroom and illustrating the potential ramifications of continuing with out certified authorized help.
7. Potential for Prejudice
The potential for prejudice represents a important consideration when evaluating a request to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer.” Prejudice, on this context, refers back to the unfair drawback or hurt that one occasion might expertise because of granting or denying the continuance. This evaluation is paramount within the courtroom’s decision-making course of, weighing the requesting occasion’s want for authorized illustration towards the potential detriment to the opposing occasion.
-
Monetary Burden
Granting a continuance can impose a monetary burden on the opposing occasion. Delays might necessitate further authorized charges for continued preparation, extended discovery, and rescheduling of witnesses. If the opposing occasion has restricted monetary sources, this added expense can create a major drawback. Conversely, denying a continuance to a celebration missing funds for authorized illustration can lead to their incapability to adequately current their case, creating prejudice within the type of unequal entry to justice. A courtroom should take into account these disparate monetary implications when assessing a request to proceed.
-
Evidentiary Points
The passage of time ensuing from a continuance can affect the supply and reliability of proof. Witnesses might turn into unavailable as a result of relocation, sickness, or reminiscence deterioration. Paperwork could also be misplaced or destroyed. These evidentiary points can prejudice the opposing occasion’s capacity to construct a robust case or problem the requesting occasion’s claims. As an illustration, a key witness shifting out of state throughout the continuance interval might considerably weaken the opposing occasion’s capacity to corroborate their testimony. The courtroom should consider the potential for such evidentiary prejudice when deciding whether or not to grant the continuance.
-
Emotional Misery
Divorce proceedings are inherently emotionally taxing. Prolonging the method by way of a continuance can exacerbate emotional misery for all events concerned, notably youngsters. Uncertainty relating to custody preparations, monetary stability, and the general decision of the divorce can negatively affect psychological well being and well-being. Whereas emotional misery is tough to quantify, the courtroom should acknowledge its potential affect on all events when contemplating a continuance. Denying a continuance might alleviate the emotional burden of extended litigation however might additionally prejudice a celebration’s capacity to successfully current their case as a result of lack of authorized illustration.
-
Strategic Manipulation
The potential for strategic manipulation is a major concern. A celebration would possibly request a continuance on the eve of trial as a tactic to delay proceedings, put on down the opposing occasion, or achieve an unfair benefit. If the courtroom suspects that the request is just not made in good religion however is meant to control the method, it’s extra more likely to deny the continuance to stop prejudice to the opposing occasion. Thorough scrutiny of the requesting occasion’s actions and motivations is essential in discerning real want from strategic gamesmanship.
The willpower of “potential for prejudice” is a nuanced and fact-specific inquiry. The courtroom should meticulously weigh the competing pursuits of each events, contemplating the monetary, evidentiary, emotional, and strategic implications of granting or denying a continuance. Finally, the courtroom goals to attain a good and equitable consequence, minimizing prejudice to both occasion whereas guaranteeing that every one people have an affordable alternative to current their case successfully. This cautious balancing act underscores the complexities concerned within the choice to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer,” highlighting the significance of presenting a compelling case that addresses the potential for prejudice to either side.
8. Communication with Courtroom
Efficient communication with the courtroom is paramount when in search of to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer.” The success of such a movement hinges on the readability, timeliness, and professionalism of all communications. Constant, clear dialogue establishes credibility and demonstrates a real dedication to adhering to courtroom procedures. For instance, promptly notifying the courtroom of the intent to hunt a continuance, offering detailed causes for the request, and providing affordable proposed timelines considerably improve the probability of a positive consequence. Conversely, ambiguous or delayed communication can create suspicion and undermine the justification for the continuance. Subsequently, communication serves as a important part, instantly impacting the courtroom’s notion of the request and its total choice.
Particular examples spotlight the sensible significance of this connection. If a person experiences unexpected difficulties securing authorized illustration near the trial date, instantly informing the courtroom and offering documentation of efforts to seek out counsel (e.g., letters to attorneys, rejection notices) demonstrates diligence. Alternatively, if the opposing occasion objects to the continuance, proactively participating in discussions with the courtroom and proposing various options, comparable to a restricted continuance or expedited discovery, can foster a collaborative strategy. Failure to keep up open traces of communication can result in misunderstandings, assumptions of unhealthy religion, and in the end, a denial of the continuance. Furthermore, adherence to courtroom guidelines relating to submitting deadlines, correct formatting of paperwork, and respectful communication with courtroom workers is important to sustaining credibility and guaranteeing that the request is given due consideration.
In abstract, efficient communication with the courtroom is just not merely a procedural formality however a important determinant within the consequence of a movement to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer.” The problem lies in conveying the urgency and validity of the request whereas concurrently adhering to courtroom guidelines and demonstrating respect for the judicial course of. By prioritizing clear, well timed, {and professional} communication, people can considerably improve their probabilities of securing the continuance mandatory to acquire authorized illustration and guarantee a good and equitable decision to their divorce proceedings.
Steadily Requested Questions
The next addresses generally raised inquiries in regards to the postponement of divorce proceedings in Arizona to safe authorized illustration.
Query 1: Beneath what circumstances would possibly an Arizona courtroom grant a continuance of a divorce trial to permit a celebration to rent an lawyer?
An Arizona courtroom might grant a continuance if the occasion demonstrates a sound motive for needing further time to safe authorized illustration. Such causes might embody sudden complexity within the case, a sudden change in monetary circumstances affecting the flexibility to afford counsel, or documented issue to find obtainable attorneys inside an affordable timeframe.
Query 2: What documentation is mostly required to assist a movement to proceed a divorce trial for the aim of hiring an lawyer?
Supporting documentation typically contains affidavits explaining the circumstances necessitating the continuance, proof of makes an attempt to safe authorized counsel (e.g., letters to attorneys, rejection notices), and monetary information demonstrating an incapability to afford illustration with out further time.
Query 3: How does the complexity of a divorce case affect the courtroom’s choice on a movement to proceed to safe authorized illustration?
The extra complicated the case, the extra doubtless the courtroom is to grant a continuance. Instances involving important property, enterprise valuations, contested little one custody preparations, or allegations of home violence typically necessitate specialised authorized experience, justifying the necessity for a continuance.
Query 4: What elements will a courtroom take into account when assessing the potential prejudice to the opposing occasion if a continuance is granted?
The courtroom will take into account elements such because the monetary burden on the opposing occasion because of the delay, the potential for lack of proof or witness unavailability, the affect on little one custody preparations, and whether or not the request for a continuance is a strategic maneuver to delay proceedings.
Query 5: Can a courtroom deny a movement to proceed a divorce trial to rent an lawyer even when the requesting occasion demonstrates a necessity for authorized illustration?
Sure, a courtroom retains the discretion to disclaim the movement if it determines that the delay would unduly prejudice the opposing occasion or if the requesting occasion has not demonstrated due diligence in making an attempt to safe authorized counsel. A scarcity of credible justification or proof of strategic delay ways may result in denial.
Query 6: What steps can a person take to extend the probability of a courtroom granting a movement to proceed a divorce trial to rent an lawyer?
People ought to proactively search authorized counsel, doc their efforts to safe illustration, talk clearly with the courtroom relating to the explanations for the request, show the complexity of their case, and suggest an affordable timeframe for rescheduling the trial. Addressing potential prejudice to the opposing occasion may enhance the probabilities of success.
Securing authorized illustration is essential in complicated divorce proceedings. Looking for skilled steering early and understanding the procedural mechanisms obtainable can result in a extra equitable decision.
The next part delves into the method of getting ready for a divorce trial in Arizona, providing insights into gathering mandatory documentation and presenting a compelling case.
Strategic Issues
Efficiently navigating a request to postpone an Arizona divorce trial to safe authorized illustration requires cautious planning and execution. The next ideas supply steering on optimizing the probability of a positive consequence.
Tip 1: Provoke the Seek for Counsel Early: Don’t postpone the seek for authorized illustration till the eve of trial. Commencing the method effectively upfront demonstrates diligence and proactive engagement, which reinforces credibility with the courtroom. Start researching potential attorneys and scheduling consultations as quickly as divorce proceedings begin or seem imminent.
Tip 2: Doc All Makes an attempt to Safe Counsel: Preserve meticulous information of all communication with potential attorneys. This contains dates of contact, names of attorneys consulted, causes for declining illustration (e.g., scheduling conflicts, monetary constraints), and any related correspondence. This documentation serves as tangible proof of the hassle expended to safe authorized illustration.
Tip 3: Articulate the Complexity of the Case: Clearly and concisely current the precise complexities of the divorce case to the courtroom. Spotlight the presence of great property, enterprise valuations, contested little one custody preparations, allegations of home violence, or another elements necessitating specialised authorized experience. Be certain that the articulation is factual and avoids emotional language.
Tip 4: Present a Justification for the Delay: Define an affordable and justifiable motive for the delay. The justification ought to clearly show the necessity for a continuance, comparable to a sudden change in monetary circumstances, sudden complexities within the case, or the unavailability of appropriate counsel. Keep away from imprecise or unsubstantiated claims, and supply supporting documentation every time potential.
Tip 5: Suggest a Affordable Timeline: Supply the courtroom a practical timeline for securing authorized illustration and getting ready for trial. This demonstrates a dedication to expediting the method and minimizing any potential prejudice to the opposing occasion. The proposed timeline must be possible and have in mind the time required to conduct a radical seek for counsel and permit the lawyer to adequately put together for the case.
Tip 6: Handle Potential Prejudice to the Opposing Get together: Acknowledge and deal with the potential prejudice to the opposing occasion ensuing from the delay. Supply options to mitigate any adverse affect, comparable to agreeing to keep up present non permanent orders or expediting discovery. Demonstrating consciousness of the opposing occasion’s considerations strengthens the general request.
Tip 7: Adjust to All Procedural Necessities: Guarantee strict adherence to all procedural guidelines and deadlines for submitting motions and speaking with the courtroom. Errors in submitting or failure to adjust to deadlines can undermine the request and create a adverse impression.
Adhering to those methods maximizes the potential for securing a continuance and acquiring the authorized illustration mandatory for a good and equitable decision. Proactive engagement, thorough documentation, and clear communication are important elements of a profitable request.
The following part will delve into the essential components concerned in getting ready for a divorce trial in Arizona, together with gathering the required documentation and successfully presenting a compelling case.
Conclusion
The previous exploration has outlined key concerns surrounding a movement to proceed an Arizona divorce trial for the aim of securing authorized illustration. The choice to grant such a continuance hinges upon a fragile steadiness of things, together with the justification introduced, the complexity of the case, lawyer availability, and the potential for prejudice to both occasion. Efficient communication with the courtroom and adherence to procedural necessities are paramount in navigating this course of.
The flexibility to “proceed az divorce trial to rent an lawyer” represents a important safeguard for people going through complicated authorized proceedings. Understanding the nuances of this procedural mechanism empowers people to guard their rights and search equitable outcomes. Navigating divorce requires knowledgeable selections; in search of authorized counsel early stays a prudent plan of action.
