Utah is not strictly a 50/50 divorce state relating to the division of marital property. As an alternative, Utah adheres to the precept of equitable distribution. Which means belongings and money owed acquired through the marriage are divided pretty and justly between the events. The division could not essentially be an equal break up; slightly, the courtroom considers numerous components to make sure an final result deemed equitable beneath the precise circumstances of the case. For instance, if one partner considerably contributed to the acquisition of an asset, the courtroom would possibly award a bigger share of that asset to that partner.
The idea of equitable distribution acknowledges that contributions to a wedding prolong past monetary earnings. Contributions as a homemaker, caretaker of kids, or supporter of a partner’s profession are additionally acknowledged and valued. The courtroom goals to create a division that displays the contributions of each events and their future wants, making certain equity and minimizing potential financial hardship following the dissolution of the wedding. Understanding this precept is important, because it immediately influences the monetary outcomes of divorce proceedings inside the state.
A number of components information Utah courts in figuring out an equitable division of marital property. These components embody the size of the wedding, the contributions of every partner to the acquisition of belongings, the incomes capability of every partner, and the usual of dwelling loved through the marriage. It’s essential to seek the advice of with a professional authorized skilled to know how these components would possibly apply to a selected divorce case and to navigate the complexities of property division beneath Utah legislation. Authorized counsel can present personalised steerage and advocate for a good final result within the division of marital belongings and liabilities.
1. Equitable Distribution
The idea of equitable distribution immediately addresses the query of whether or not Utah is a 50/50 divorce state. As a result of Utah adheres to equitable distribution ideas, it’s basically not a 50/50 state. Equitable distribution dictates that marital belongings and money owed are divided pretty, not essentially equally. This distinction is paramount in understanding divorce legislation inside the state. The reason for unequal division stems from the authorized recognition that every partner’s contribution to the wedding, whether or not monetary or in any other case, will not be similar. As an example, if one partner entered the wedding with important pre-marital belongings and the opposite contributed primarily as a homemaker, a 50/50 break up is likely to be deemed inequitable. The homemaker’s contributions are valued, however the courtroom balances these contributions in opposition to the present belongings introduced into the wedding.
The significance of equitable distribution lies in its capability to accommodate the various circumstances of every marriage. An actual-life instance illustrates this: Contemplate a pair married for 25 years the place one partner constantly earned a excessive earnings whereas the opposite managed the family and raised youngsters. Upon divorce, the higher-earning partner would possibly argue for a 50/50 break up of all belongings amassed through the marriage. Nevertheless, the courtroom is prone to think about the non-financial contributions of the opposite partner, doubtlessly awarding them a better share of the marital property to compensate for his or her sacrifice of profession alternatives and their dedication to the household. This demonstrates the sensible significance of the legislation and the way the state doesn’t view divorce with the straightforward lens of a 50/50 break up.
In abstract, the equitable distribution framework in Utah ensures that divorce settlements are primarily based on equity and particular person circumstances, slightly than strict equality. This technique acknowledges the multifaceted contributions of every partner through the marriage and goals to mitigate potential financial disparities that may come up following the divorce. Challenges stay in quantifying non-financial contributions, necessitating thorough authorized illustration and proof to assist claims for a extra equitable division of belongings. Finally, the hyperlink between equitable distribution and the query of a 50/50 divorce state clarifies that Utah prioritizes justice and equity over a inflexible, uniform division of property.
2. Not Strictly Equal
The assertion that Utah is not strictly equal in divorce proceedings is a direct consequence of the state’s adherence to equitable distribution ideas. This immediately addresses the frequent query of whether or not “is utah a 50/50 divorce state.” The authorized framework in Utah prioritizes equity over a inflexible 50/50 break up, acknowledging that marital partnerships contain various contributions. The impact is that divorce settlements are tailor-made to the precise circumstances of every case, slightly than defaulting to an equal division of belongings. The state’s legislation acknowledges that an equal break up could not all the time end in a simply or equitable final result.
The significance of the “not strictly equal” element is paramount in understanding Utah divorce legislation. It underscores the flexibleness and nuanced method taken by the courts. For instance, think about a state of affairs the place one partner considerably diminished the marital property by means of reckless spending or monetary misconduct. In such a case, a 50/50 division would unfairly profit the partner chargeable for the monetary losses. The courtroom, guided by the precept of equitable distribution, can deviate from an equal break up to compensate the opposite partner for the monetary hurt inflicted. This displays a sensible recognition that equity requires consideration of every partys actions through the marriage.
In abstract, the truth that Utah is “not strictly equal” in divorce settlements emphasizes the state’s dedication to equitable distribution. This method permits the courts to deal with the distinctive complexities of every marriage and to make sure that divorce settlements are honest and simply, even when they don’t seem to be completely equal. Whereas challenges could come up in figuring out what constitutes an equitable distribution, the “not strictly equal” precept serves as a cornerstone of Utah’s divorce legislation, highlighting the state’s nuanced method in dividing marital property.
3. Marital Property Outlined
The definition of marital property is prime when figuring out whether or not Utah operates as a 50/50 divorce state. The state adheres to equitable distribution, which necessitates a transparent understanding of what constitutes marital property earlier than honest division may be thought of. Belongings and money owed acquired throughout the wedding are typically labeled as marital property, topic to division in a divorce. Belongings owned prior to the wedding, or acquired as items or inheritance throughout the wedding, are sometimes thought of separate property and should not topic to division.
-
Acquisition Throughout Marriage
Property obtained from the date of marriage till the date of separation is presumed to be marital property, no matter whose identify is on the title. As an example, if a pair purchases a house throughout their marriage, each events sometimes have an equitable declare to it, even when just one partner’s earnings was used for the down cost and mortgage. This side clarifies that energetic acquisition, not preliminary possession, determines its marital standing. It immediately influences the division framework, as solely marital property falls beneath the equitable distribution purview, distinguishing Utah from a 50/50 state.
-
Commingling of Belongings
When separate property is blended or mixed with marital property, it may turn into transmuted into marital property, thereby changing into topic to equitable division. As an actual life state of affairs, if one partner deposited inherited funds right into a joint account used for household bills, a portion of these funds is likely to be thought of marital property resulting from commingling. This case underscores the significance of sustaining the distinct nature of separate belongings throughout marriage. Commingling blurs the traces and complicates divorce proceedings, doubtlessly altering the initially supposed final result of a divorce settlement inside the framework of figuring out whether or not or not Utah is a 50/50 divorce state.
-
Improve in Worth of Separate Property
Whereas separate property itself is normally not divisible, the rise in its worth throughout the wedding because of the efforts of both partner could be thought of marital property. For instance, if one partner owned a rental property earlier than the wedding, however the different partner actively managed and improved it through the marriage, the rise within the property’s worth attributable to these efforts could possibly be topic to equitable distribution. This highlights the potential for shared contributions, even to individually owned belongings, to affect the end result. It is this nuance that separates the method from being a simplistic 50/50 break up of all belongings, no matter particular person contributions to their development.
-
Money owed Incurred Throughout Marriage
Money owed acquired through the marriage are handled equally to belongings and are thought of marital liabilities. Bank card debt, loans, and mortgages amassed through the marriage are sometimes topic to equitable division. If each spouses benefited from the debt, even when just one incurred it, the legal responsibility is taken into account marital. As an example, if a pair takes out a mortgage to rework their house, the debt is taken into account a marital legal responsibility, no matter whose identify is on the mortgage. This idea is essential as a result of it impacts the monetary final result for each events, which isn’t all the time break up equally between each events; it typically depends upon contributing components.
Defining marital property is an important first step in Utah divorce proceedings. The parameters, as outlined above, spotlight that Utah just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state. Utah’s equitable distribution legal guidelines require that solely marital property be divided pretty, and that money owed are dealt with equally. The result of a case will typically differ, relying on a spread of things, and, regardless of the complexities, equity is the final word objective.
4. Separate Property Excluded
The precept that “separate property excluded” from marital asset division immediately contradicts the notion of Utah being a 50/50 divorce state. Utah legislation distinguishes between marital property (acquired through the marriage) and separate property (owned earlier than the wedding, or acquired through the marriage as a present or inheritance). The exclusion of separate property from division is a important aspect of equitable distribution, stopping a easy, equal break up of all belongings owned by both celebration.
-
Pre-Marital Belongings
Belongings owned by a partner previous to the wedding stay their separate property all through the wedding, offered they’re saved separate. For instance, if a person owns a home earlier than getting married and retains the title solely of their identify, the home typically stays their separate property in a divorce. This reinforces that pre-marital holdings are ring-fenced and never robotically topic to division. The non-divisible nature of those belongings firmly separates Utah from a 50/50 state the place all belongings is likely to be thought of collectively owned from the second of marriage.
-
Presents and Inheritance
Property acquired by one partner as a present or inheritance through the marriage is usually thought of separate property, even whether it is acquired through the marriage. Contemplate a state of affairs the place one partner inherits a sum of cash through the marriage and retains it in an account solely of their identify. This inheritance would sometimes be thought of separate property, not topic to division within the divorce. This illustrates that occasions occurring through the marriage don’t robotically make all newly acquired belongings marital property, highlighting a key divergence from a 50/50 mannequin.
-
Tracing of Separate Property
Sustaining clear information of separate property and its origin is important. If separate property is commingled with marital property, it might lose its separate character and turn into topic to division. Nevertheless, if the separate property may be traced, it might retain its separate standing. For instance, if a partner sells a pre-marital asset and makes use of the proceeds to buy one other asset, cautious documentation is required to hint the funds and preserve its designation as separate. Tracing guidelines present a mechanism to protect the separate nature of belongings, additional distinguishing Utah from a state mandating an equal break up of all holdings no matter origin.
-
Exceptions and Concerns
There are restricted exceptions the place separate property could also be thought of in a divorce. If separate property has been used to profit the marital property, or if one partner has contributed considerably to the preservation or appreciation of the opposite spouses separate property, the courtroom could think about this when figuring out an equitable division of marital property. Nevertheless, these are exceptions slightly than the rule. As an example, if marital funds have been used to pay for important enhancements to a individually owned house, the courtroom would possibly think about the improved worth when dividing marital belongings. These nuances illustrate that whereas separate property is usually protected, its use and influence on the marital property may be thought of in reaching an equitable final result, an method rather more detailed than merely splitting belongings evenly.
The exclusion of separate property is a cornerstone of Utah’s equitable distribution framework. It ensures that belongings introduced into the wedding, or acquired individually through the marriage as items or inheritances, are typically shielded from division. This precept underscores that Utah just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state, however slightly a state that goals for equity by contemplating the origin and nature of belongings, contributions of every celebration, and different related components.
5. Contribution Issues
The idea of “Contribution Issues” is central to understanding why Utah just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state. Utah’s adherence to equitable distribution hinges on recognizing and valuing the various contributions every partner makes to the wedding, whether or not monetary or non-financial. This basically departs from a simplistic 50/50 division, acknowledging that equity requires contemplating the totality of every partner’s efforts through the marriage.
-
Monetary Contributions
Monetary contributions, equivalent to earnings earned, investments made, or enterprise ventures undertaken through the marriage, are important components in figuring out an equitable division of belongings. For instance, if one partner constantly earned a considerably increased earnings all through the wedding, this contribution could also be thought of when dividing marital belongings. It isn’t merely a query of who earned extra, however how these earnings have been used to profit the household. This illustrates that the upper earner could not robotically obtain a better share of all marital belongings, however their monetary contribution is a key consideration within the total equitable distribution.
-
Non-Monetary Contributions
Equally vital are non-financial contributions, equivalent to homemaking, childcare, and supporting a partner’s profession. These contributions are sometimes more difficult to quantify however are explicitly acknowledged by Utah courts. As an example, a partner who primarily managed the family, raised youngsters, and supported their companions profession could have sacrificed their very own profession development. The courtroom will think about this sacrifice and the ensuing influence on their incomes potential when figuring out a good division of belongings. Recognizing these non-financial parts ensures that the proceedings transcend a easy break up of earnings, and as a substitute acknowledge every partner’s function within the household dynamic.
-
Contribution to Appreciation of Belongings
A partner’s direct contribution to the appreciation of an asset, even one initially thought of separate property, can affect its classification and division. If one partner considerably contributed to the administration, enchancment, or improve in worth of an asset owned by the opposite partner, the courtroom could think about that contribution. For instance, if one partner actively managed and improved a rental property owned by the opposite earlier than the wedding, the rise in worth through the marriage attributable to these efforts could possibly be topic to equitable distribution. This underscores that energetic participation, slightly than mere possession, can rework the asset to marital.
-
Destructive Contributions: Waste or Dissipation of Belongings
Conversely, actions that negatively influence the marital property are additionally thought of. If one partner engaged in wasteful spending, playing, or different monetary misconduct that depleted marital belongings, this may be factored into the property division. As an example, if one partner incurred important playing money owed with out the data or consent of the opposite, the courtroom could award the opposite partner a better share of the remaining marital belongings to compensate for the monetary losses. This demonstrates how destructive actions weigh into the steadiness, deviating from a 50/50 method.
The precept that “Contribution Issues” is a cornerstone of Utahs divorce legislation. It prevents a mechanical 50/50 division of belongings and ensures that divorce settlements replicate the distinctive circumstances of every marriage and every partner’s contributions. By contemplating each monetary and non-financial contributions, in addition to actions which will have negatively impacted the marital property, Utah courts intention to attain a good and equitable final result that acknowledges the totality of the marital partnership. The result’s an in depth course of that appears past percentages to make sure that, whatever the preliminary state of affairs, the end result is as equitable and honest as doable.
6. Fault Irrelevant
The precept of “Fault Irrelevant” in Utah divorce proceedings additional reinforces that the state is not a 50/50 divorce state. Utah is a “no-fault” divorce state, that means that neither partner must show the opposite’s misconduct to acquire a divorce. Grounds for divorce embody irreconcilable variations, that means the wedding has damaged down irretrievably. Consequently, infidelity, abuse, abandonment, or different actions that is likely to be thought of “fault” should not main components in figuring out property division. The main focus stays on equitable distribution of marital belongings, no matter which partner could have been chargeable for the breakdown of the wedding. This distinguishes Utah from states the place marital misconduct immediately influences the allocation of property.
The significance of the “Fault Irrelevant” precept lies in its streamlining impact on divorce proceedings. Eliminating the necessity to show fault reduces the adversarial nature of divorce and permits the courtroom to give attention to the monetary features of dissolving the wedding. For instance, even when one partner dedicated adultery, that reality won’t robotically entitle the opposite partner to a bigger share of the marital belongings. As an alternative, the courtroom will give attention to components such because the size of the wedding, the contributions of every partner, and their future wants. This promotes a extra environment friendly and fewer emotionally charged course of, permitting each events to maneuver ahead extra shortly. The absence of a fault requirement underscores Utah’s dedication to resolving divorce circumstances primarily based on monetary realities and equitable ideas, slightly than ethical judgments.
In abstract, the “Fault Irrelevant” precept is a key element of Utah’s divorce framework, affirming that the state just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state and fostering a extra pragmatic and fewer acrimonious divorce course of. Whereas proof of egregious marital misconduct is likely to be thought of in restricted circumstances (equivalent to circumstances involving the dissipation of marital belongings), it typically doesn’t affect the property division. This technique promotes a give attention to equitable distribution, making certain that divorce settlements are primarily based on equity and monetary realities slightly than on assigning blame for the top of the wedding.
7. Courtroom Discretion
Courtroom discretion performs a pivotal function in reinforcing that Utah just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state. Whereas the precept of equitable distribution guides property division, Utah legislation grants judges appreciable latitude in figuring out what constitutes a good and simply final result in every distinctive case. This discretionary energy immediately impacts how marital belongings and money owed are allotted, shifting past a mechanical, equal break up. The breadth of this discretion underscores that the end result is very depending on the precise info offered and the choose’s interpretation of these info in mild of established authorized ideas.
The importance of courtroom discretion is obvious in circumstances involving advanced monetary conditions or distinctive household dynamics. For instance, if one partner has a incapacity or faces important well being challenges, the courtroom could train its discretion to award them a bigger share of the marital belongings to make sure their future well-being. Equally, if one partner considerably depleted marital belongings by means of reckless spending or monetary misconduct, the courtroom can deviate from an equal break up to compensate the opposite partner. The true-world influence is substantial: settlements can differ considerably even in seemingly related conditions, highlighting the significance of expert authorized illustration to successfully current a case and advocate for a positive final result. A transparent understanding of courtroom discretion is subsequently important for anybody navigating a divorce in Utah.
In abstract, the presence of courtroom discretion inside Utah’s equitable distribution framework is a key indicator that Utah doesn’t function as a 50/50 divorce state. The power of judges to contemplate the distinctive circumstances of every case and tailor property divisions accordingly ensures that equity, slightly than strict equality, is the tenet. Whereas this discretion introduces a component of unpredictability, it additionally permits the authorized system to deal with the various wants and challenges confronted by divorcing {couples}. Recognizing the significance and scope of courtroom discretion is important for efficient navigation of the Utah divorce course of.
8. Alimony Separate
The consideration of alimony as separate from property division is a elementary facet of Utah divorce legislation, emphasizing that the state just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state. Whereas property division focuses on equitably distributing belongings and money owed acquired through the marriage, alimony (also referred to as spousal assist) addresses the continued monetary wants of a partner after the divorce is finalized. Alimony just isn’t robotically awarded; its willpower relies on a unique set of things and issues than these governing property division.
-
Wants of the Recipient Partner
A main think about awarding alimony is the recipient partner’s demonstrated want for monetary assist. This want is assessed by evaluating their capability to turn into self-sufficient by means of employment or different means. For instance, if a partner has been out of the workforce for an prolonged interval to lift youngsters or assist the opposite partner’s profession, they could require alimony to bridge the hole till they will purchase the mandatory abilities and employment to assist themselves. The analysis just isn’t primarily based on a formulaic calculation tied to property values, additional underscoring the separateness of alimony and property division. The give attention to wants is the explanation that Utah just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state, however slightly one which takes particular person and distinctive necessities into consideration.
-
Capacity of the Payor Partner to Pay
Even when a necessity for alimony is established, the courtroom should additionally think about the payor partner’s capability to offer assist with out undue monetary hardship. The courtroom evaluates their earnings, bills, and present monetary obligations to find out an affordable alimony quantity. If the payor partner has restricted monetary assets, the courtroom could cut back or deny alimony, even when the recipient partner has a reliable want. This interaction between want and talent to pay ensures that alimony awards are sensible and sustainable, slightly than being arbitrarily tied to property divisions or preset percentages. The legislation displays a dedication to practicality slightly than a easy break up.
-
Normal of Residing Throughout Marriage
The usual of dwelling established through the marriage is one other related think about figuring out alimony. The courtroom considers the life-style the couple loved through the marriage and makes an attempt to make sure that the recipient partner can preserve an affordable lifestyle after the divorce, to the extent doable. This doesn’t imply replicating the precise way of life, however slightly offering adequate assist to forestall a drastic decline in dwelling requirements. This consideration ties into the recipient’s wants however is evaluated distinctly from the property division, highlighting that the upkeep of a suitable way of life by means of spousal assist is distinct from the division of shared marital assets.
-
Period of the Marriage
The size of the wedding is a major determinant of the period of alimony. Longer marriages typically warrant longer durations of alimony, reflecting the better financial interdependence that develops over time. A brief-term marriage could end in little or no alimony, whereas a decades-long marriage could justify indefinite or everlasting alimony. The period is assessed independently of the property division, which focuses on belongings amassed through the marriage, no matter its size. It’s this evaluation of period, versus the asset division, that defines the necessity to think about every particular person’s circumstance, emphasizing the explanation that Utah just isn’t a 50/50 divorce state.
The separation of alimony from property division emphasizes that Utah’s method to divorce just isn’t a easy 50/50 break up. Alimony addresses ongoing monetary wants and relies on components distinct from these governing the division of belongings and money owed. By contemplating the wants of the recipient partner, the power of the payor partner to pay, the usual of dwelling through the marriage, and the period of the wedding, Utah courts intention to attain a good and equitable final result that extends past the preliminary division of marital property. Alimony goals to stage the taking part in area after divorce.
Often Requested Questions
This part addresses frequent questions relating to property division in Utah divorces, particularly specializing in the misperception of a 50/50 break up.
Query 1: What does “equitable distribution” imply in Utah divorce circumstances?
Equitable distribution signifies that marital belongings and money owed are divided pretty, however not essentially equally, between divorcing events. Utah courts think about numerous components to find out a simply division, together with contributions to the wedding, incomes capability, and future wants.
Query 2: How is marital property outlined in Utah?
Marital property encompasses belongings and money owed acquired by both partner from the date of marriage till the date of separation. It excludes separate property, which incorporates belongings owned earlier than the wedding, or acquired through the marriage as items or inheritance.
Query 3: Does marital fault, equivalent to adultery, have an effect on property division in Utah?
Utah is a no-fault divorce state. Due to this fact, marital fault sometimes doesn’t immediately affect property division. The main focus stays on reaching an equitable final result primarily based on monetary contributions and desires.
Query 4: If one partner stayed house to lift youngsters, does that have an effect on property division?
Sure. Utah courts acknowledge the worth of non-financial contributions, equivalent to homemaking and childcare. These contributions are thought of when figuring out an equitable division of marital belongings, doubtlessly resulting in a better share for the homemaking partner.
Query 5: Can pre-marital belongings be divided in a Utah divorce?
Usually, pre-marital belongings are thought of separate property and should not topic to division. Nevertheless, if pre-marital belongings are commingled with marital belongings, or if the opposite partner contributed to their appreciation, they could turn into topic to equitable distribution.
Query 6: How does alimony differ from property division in Utah?
Alimony, or spousal assist, is distinct from property division. It addresses the continued monetary wants of a partner after the divorce and relies on components equivalent to incomes capability, the usual of dwelling through the marriage, and the size of the wedding. It isn’t an automated entitlement and is set independently of property division.
In abstract, Utah’s equitable distribution system prioritizes equity over a inflexible 50/50 break up. Varied components, together with contributions, wants, and the character of belongings, affect the end result of property division in divorce circumstances.
The following part supplies assets and additional info relating to Utah divorce legislation.
Navigating Divorce in Utah
Understanding Utah’s equitable distribution legal guidelines is essential for people considering or present process divorce. The following pointers present key issues for navigating the method.
Tip 1: Perceive the Distinction Between Marital and Separate Property: Precisely establish belongings and money owed acquired through the marriage versus these owned previous to the wedding or acquired as items/inheritance. Correct categorization is prime to figuring out the divisible marital property.
Tip 2: Doc All Monetary and Non-Monetary Contributions: Compile proof of each monetary contributions (earnings, investments) and non-financial contributions (homemaking, childcare, profession assist) to the wedding. These contributions considerably influence the equitable division of belongings.
Tip 3: Preserve Meticulous Monetary Information: Hold thorough information of earnings, bills, financial institution accounts, funding accounts, and any transactions involving marital belongings. These information are important for correct monetary disclosure and valuation.
Tip 4: Search Knowledgeable Authorized Counsel: Seek the advice of with an skilled Utah divorce lawyer to know particular person rights and obligations beneath Utah legislation. A talented lawyer can present tailor-made steerage and advocate for a good final result.
Tip 5: Be Conscious of Commingling: Keep away from commingling separate property with marital property, as this could rework separate belongings into marital belongings topic to division. Preserve clear distinctions between separate and marital funds.
Tip 6: Perceive the Position of Courtroom Discretion: Acknowledge that Utah courts have broad discretion in figuring out an equitable division of belongings. Outcomes can differ primarily based on the choose’s interpretation of the info and software of authorized ideas.
Tip 7: Contemplate Alimony Individually: Perceive that alimony (spousal assist) is distinct from property division and relies on various factors, equivalent to want, capability to pay, and the usual of dwelling through the marriage.
Efficiently navigating a divorce in Utah requires a complete understanding of equitable distribution ideas, correct monetary documentation, and knowledgeable authorized steerage. By specializing in these features, people can improve their possibilities of reaching a good and equitable settlement.
The conclusion supplies further assets and a abstract of key takeaways.
Conclusion
The exploration of whether or not “is utah a 50/50 divorce state” reveals a nuanced authorized panorama. Utah operates beneath the precept of equitable distribution, not a strict 50/50 division of belongings. Components equivalent to particular person contributions, separate property, and courtroom discretion considerably affect the end result of divorce proceedings. Alimony is taken into account individually, additional distinguishing Utah from a group property state.
Navigating the intricacies of Utah divorce legislation necessitates a radical understanding of equitable distribution and the assorted parts that form property division. Consulting with authorized counsel is strongly suggested to make sure a good and simply final result reflecting particular person circumstances. The pursuit of knowledgeable decision-making stays paramount in navigating the complexities of divorce.
